This year, the Federal Trade Commission decided shake up the labor market, proposing to ban non-compete clauses for the tens of millions of workers they affect. The clauses are essentially contracts between employers and employees that prohibit the former from competing with the business after the employment has ended. As many as 30% of all U.S. private sector workers have signed such agreements, which actually find their roots all the way back in 15th century England. Those who defend such clauses say employers need these contracts to protect their investments in training workers, not to mention safeguarding their trade secrets. The contracts, they say, represent not only a fair exchange, but also serve as an important fortification for businesses within the broader economy. The FTC, they say, is overextending. But opponents argue that such contracts prevent workers from starting their own businesses, locking them into undercompensated positions, and depress labor mobility and wage growth, while contributing to race and gender gaps. It is in this context that we debate the following question: Should the FTC Ban Non-compete Clauses? 

Breakdown

BIGGEST SHIFT

Undecided
0 %
Undecided
Change in voter behavior
0% - Swung from the Side
0% - Remained Undecided
0% - Swung from the Side
ARGUING NO
0 %
ARGUING NO
Change in voter behavior
0% - Remained on the Side
0% - Swung from the Side
0% - Swung from Undecided
ARGUING YES
0 %
ARGUING YES
Change in voter behavior
0% - Swung from the Side
0% - Remained on the Side
0% - Swung from Undecided
JOIN THE CONVERSATION
4

Have an idea for a debate or have a question for the Open to Debate Team?

DEBATE COMMUNITY
Join a community of social and intellectual leaders that truly value the free exchange of ideas.
EDUCATIONAL BRIEFS
Readings on our weekly debates, debater editorials, and news on issues that affect our everyday lives.
SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.