Norman Fost - Open to Debate

aviator 1 win 1win aviator pinup india lucky jet crash pin-up 4rabet india 1 win lucky jet x 1win sayti 4era bet pin up casino online mosbet pinup pin up casino one win game lucky jet pin up 1win 1win online 1win aposta 4rabet mosbet casino parimatch 4rabet bangladesh mostbet aviator login parimatch mostbet casino pin up mostbet az mostbet aviator pinup mostbet kz 1 win 1win slot mostbet casino mostbet pin up 777 1 win mosbet india pin up 1win aviator mostbet aviator 1 win 1win yüklə 1 win az aviator lacky jet mostbet casino lucky jet mosbet aviator mostbet india

Register Login

Debates
- Features
- Topics
  Upcoming debates
- Close ✕
  - Ban the Box:…
    
    1 in 3 adults in the United States have a criminal record, which offers significant challenges to these individuals, including reentering the job market after incarceration. Over the years, there’s been a push for “Ban the Box” policies that call for removing questions asking about criminal history on job applications to give former offenders a fair chance by delaying background checks until later in the hiring process. Those who are against early screening argue that former offenders shouldn’t continue to be punished by the system, especially when it disproportionally affects minorities. It also prevents applicants from contributing and reintegrating into society and reducing dependency on social services. Those who disagree and say that screening a job applicant’s criminal history is important, argue that employers have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their business, employees, and customers and make informed hiring decisions. Without early screening, some recent studies show that employers might unconsciously resort to biased assumptions or stereotypes when evaluating candidates. With this context, we debate Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications?
    
    Friday, April 19, 2024
Insights
About
- - Become a Member
  - Newsletter
- Close ✕
  
  SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
  
  Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.
  Donate
Header Bottom
- Become a member Newsletter Donate

Become a member Donate

Norman Fost

M.D., M.P.H., a Professor of Pediatrics and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin, and Director of the Bioethics Program

Fost founded the Bioethics Program at the University of Wisconsin in 1973. He has published widely on ethical and legal issues in health care, served on numerous federal committees, including President Clinton’s Health Care Task Force, and from 1994–1998 was an elected member of the Princeton University Board of Trustees.

Debates Featuring Norman Fost

We Should Accept Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Competitive Sports

With Radley Balko, Norman Fost, George Michael, Dale Murphy, Richard Pound, Julian Savulescu
January 15, 2008

As performance-enhancing drugs become more prevalent in competitive sports, opponents are crying foul. They argue that athletes gain an unnatural, and unfair, advantage over their competitors by using drugs, and that widespread use is likely to pressure all players into taking them just to stay in the game. But as society is increasingly invested in personal enhancers and sports become more technologically advanced, is drugging in sports all that bad?

We Should Accept Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Competitive Sports

As performance-enhancing drugs become more prevalent in competitive sports, opponents are crying foul. They argue that athletes gain an unnatural, and unfair, advantage over their competitors by using drugs, and that widespread use is likely…

With Radley Balko, Norman Fost, George Michael, Dale Murphy, Richard Pound, Julian Savulescu
January 15, 2008

Sign Up / Log In

@ 2006-2024, Open to Debate Foundation, All rights reserved