The New U.S. Nuclear Posture Review: Implications for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Security - Open to Debate

aviator 1 win 1win aviator pinup india lucky jet crash pin-up 4rabet india 1 win lucky jet x 1win sayti 4era bet pin up casino online mosbet pinup pin up casino one win game lucky jet pin up 1win 1win online 1win aposta 4rabet mosbet casino parimatch 4rabet bangladesh mostbet aviator login parimatch mostbet casino pin up mostbet az mostbet aviator pinup mostbet kz 1 win 1win slot mostbet casino mostbet pin up 777 1 win mosbet india pin up 1win aviator mostbet aviator 1 win 1win yüklə 1 win az aviator lacky jet mostbet casino lucky jet mosbet aviator mostbet india

Debates
- Features
- Topics
  Upcoming debates
- Close ✕
  - Ban the Box:…
    
    1 in 3 adults in the United States have a criminal record, which offers significant challenges to these individuals, including reentering the job market after incarceration. Over the years, there’s been a push for “Ban the Box” policies that call for removing questions asking about criminal history on job applications to give former offenders a fair chance by delaying background checks until later in the hiring process. Those who are against early screening argue that former offenders shouldn’t continue to be punished by the system, especially when it disproportionally affects minorities. It also prevents applicants from contributing and reintegrating into society and reducing dependency on social services. Those who disagree and say that screening a job applicant’s criminal history is important, argue that employers have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their business, employees, and customers and make informed hiring decisions. Without early screening, some recent studies show that employers might unconsciously resort to biased assumptions or stereotypes when evaluating candidates. With this context, we debate Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications?
    
    Friday, April 19, 2024
Insights
About
- - Become a Member
  - Newsletter
- Close ✕
  
  SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
  
  Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.
  Donate
Header Bottom
- Become a member Newsletter Donate

Become a member Donate

The New U.S. Nuclear Posture Review: Implications for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Security

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

By Bonnie Jenkins

Ambassador Bonnie Jenkins discusses the Nuclear Posture Review and the global goal of nonproliferation.

Link to Article
Article source: Hudson Institute

DEBATE COMMUNITY

Join a community of social and intellectual leaders that truly value the free exchange of ideas.

BECOME A MEMBER

EDUCATIONAL BRIEFS

Readings on our weekly debates, debater editorials, and news on issues that affect our everyday lives.

NEWSLETTER

SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE

Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.

DONATE

Features

Topics

Upcoming debates

SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE

The New U.S. Nuclear Posture Review: Implications for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Security

DEBATE COMMUNITY

EDUCATIONAL BRIEFS

SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE

Be Curious. Be Open-Minded. Be Open to Debate.