ARGUING YES

Anti-Democracy theorist and Tech Entrepreneur
ARGUING NO

Founder of the RadicalxChange Foundation and Plurality Institute
MODERATOR

Host and Moderator-in-Chief
This week:
- New episode: Should the U.S. elect a CEO dictator, or embrace its imperfect but resilient democratic system?
- Your Sunday reading list
What if the United States abandoned its democratic system and instead opted for a CEO-style dictator to run the country like a high-performing company?
One of this week’s debaters, anti-democracy theorist and tech entrepreneur, Curtis Yarvin, is a proponent of the idea, which is said to be gaining traction in influential policy circles in Silicon Valley and Washington, DC. Yarvin’s growing political influence was profiled in a New Yorker article in June of 2025, and Elon Musk reportedly consulted him on the formation of a new party in July. A self-described monarchist, Yarvin argues that democracy is too slow and ineffective to meet the challenges of the modern world and deliver efficiency at scale.
But at what cost? His opponent, E. Glen Weyl, Founder of the RadicalxChange Foundation, Plurality Institute, and Microsoft Research’s Plural Technology Collaboratory, counters that consolidating power under one leader undermines the values at the core of America’s political system. History offers cautionary tales of autocratic rulers whose unchecked power led to disastrous decisions and societal breakdowns. How could the country reasonably consider abandoning democratic norms, even if it’s a messy process, on occasion?
We brought these sharply divergent perspectives together for a live debate at Racket, a music venue in New York City on Thursday evening.

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz

Photo credits: Sam Lahoz
WEEKLY POINTS OF VIEW
Rana Foroohar | August 31, 2025
The Financial Times
Watch Rana’s debate on whether globalization has backfired
Markets say relax. Trump critics say panic. Who’s right?
Tyler Cowen | August 31, 2025
The Free Press
Watch Tyler’s debate on whether it’s wrong to pay for sex
Chinese gaming regulations largely failed to achieve their goals
Jeffrey Miron | August 29, 2025
Cato Institute
Watch Jeffrey’s debate on the causes of Mexico’s drug war
How to arm Ukraine for negotiations
Michael McFaul | August 27, 2025
Foreign Affairs
Watch Michael’s debate on isolating Russia diplomatically
The ingredients of a lasting marriage
Jessica Grose | August 27, 2025
The New York Times
Watch Jessica’s debate on the prospects of millennials
Even Democracy Can Be Debatable
Democracy thrives when its principles are openly discussed, tested, and defended. We believe that exploring questions about democracy is essential, because democracy itself only survives when citizens engage, question, and listen. That is what debate provides — a space to strengthen democracy by modeling dialogue over division. This is only possible with your support — donate today.
