Newsletter: Did Harvard Have It Coming?

ARGUING YES

Alan Dershowitz

Emeritus Professor of Law at Harvard Law School

 


ARGUING NO

Lawrence Summers

President Emeritus of Harvard University; Former Secretary of the Treasury

 


MODERATOR

John Donvan

Host and Moderator-in-Chief

 


This week:

  • New episode: Is the Trump administration justified in its actions against Harvard?
  • A closer look at the federal grants that are in jeopardy
  • Your Sunday reading list

 


The Trump administration’s war on Harvard is intensifying.

This week alone, the administration threatened Harvard’s accreditation and has issued a subpoena regarding international students’ records. Previously, the Trump administration froze over $2 billion in federal grants, slashed an additional $450 million, and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. The accusations are multifaceted: claims of campus antisemitism, “anti-Americanism,” coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party, and an unchecked culture of diversity programs.

Harvard is pushing back. The university has already filed lawsuits in response, challenging the administration’s actions as politically motivated and an infringement on its academic freedom. The court cases are ongoing, with the outcome potentially reshaping the future of higher education in America.

In this episode of Open to Debate, we bring together two of Harvard’s most distinguished voices —former Harvard President Lawrence Summers and Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz — to unpack this crucial question: Did Harvard fail to address these pressing issues, or is this just a politically charged attack on free speech and academic freedom?

It’s a thought-provoking topic that veers from a few clashes to a surprising degree of common ground – something a little bit different than a regular Open to Debate episode, where debaters are clearly on opposing sides.  This happened in part because the story is moving so quickly.

The result is a timely and nuanced discussion about free speech, anti-semitism, meritocracy, the evolving culture of elite universities, and the threat of government interference.

Take a listen. As always, let us know what you think.

More soon,

 

Lia Matthow

Chief Content Officer

 


DEBATING THE DATA
Does terminating critical research grants go too far?

 

 


WEEKLY POINTS OF VIEW

 


The Budget Bill’s Big Consequences

Ray Dalio | July 3, 2025

TIME

Watch Ray’s conversation on changing your mind

 


Why We Love America

Reihan Salam, Renu Mukherjee, Rafael A. Mangual, Carolyn D. Gorman, Ilya Shapiro and Daniel Di Martino | July 4, 2025

City Journal

Watch Reihan’s debate on whether Florida is eating New York’s lunch

 


The American people are driven by fairness and decency

Norman Ornstein | July 2, 2025

The Contrarian

Watch Norman’s debate on the two-party system

 


Can Elon Musk seriously start a third party?

Matt Bai, Megan McArdle and Karen Tumulty | July 3, 2025

The Washington Post

Watch Megan’s debate on whether Obamacare is beyond rescue

 


The global economy is suffering from the Rashomon effect

Rana Foroohar | July 6, 2025

Financial Times

Watch Rana’s debate on whether globalization has backfired

 


Debate Belongs in Higher Education

We know debate strengthens critical thinking and open dialogue — essential elements in higher education today. When students engage with perspectives from both sides of an argument, they become better thinkers and more informed citizens. Donate today to help us bring critical thinking, civility, and the lasting power of debate to classrooms and campuses across the nation.

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed on our thought-provoking debates, dynamic live events, and educational initiatives.