Sign In

Debates
- Features
- Topics
  Upcoming debates
- Close ✕
  - Does Alcoholics Anonymous…
    
    Dry January has become increasingly popular, practiced by a quarter of Americans last year, and provides individuals a collegial and open path for reconsidering their alcohol consumption. For almost two million people worldwide who have committed to staying sober for a lifetime, the group known as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and its 12-step plan has been a prominent lifeline. But is it the best approach for curbing alcoholism, and does it address its root causes? Those who say AA is invaluable emphasize the merits of its peer-driven, community-based approach. They also point out that membership is free, only requiring a desire to stop drinking. Opportunities for fellowship can be found nearly anywhere, even in communities with limited access to healthcare or treatment facilities. Those who say there might be a better way to sobriety argue that AA’s long-term success rates vary widely. They also note equity issues and note concerns with the program’s focus on abstinence rather than moderation. They say other therapies and interventions, such as harm reduction therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy, would help those who may not succeed in the program. Now with this background and in Dry January 2025, we debate the question: Does AA Work?
    
    Friday, January 3, 2025
Insights
About
- - Become a Member
  - Newsletter
- Close ✕
  
  SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
  
  Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.
  Donate
Header Bottom
- Become a member Newsletter Donate

Become a member Donate

George Perkovich

Vice president for Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, DC.

George is an expert in US foreign policy, non-proliferation, security, global governance, non-governmental actors, India, Iran, and Pakistan.

Debates Featuring George Perkovich

We Must Tolerate a Nuclear Iran

With Patrick Clawson, Reuel Marc Gerecht, Bill Kristol, George Perkovich, Karim Sadjadpour, Sanam Vakil

September 27, 2006

There is no doubt that a nuclear Iran would be a danger to the United States and its allies. But would the costs of going to war outweigh the costs of tolerating a nuclear Iran? And is diplomacy without the threat of military force ineffective?

We Must Tolerate a Nuclear Iran

There is no doubt that a nuclear Iran would be a danger to the United States and its allies. But would the costs of going to war outweigh the costs of tolerating a nuclear Iran? …

With Patrick Clawson, Reuel Marc Gerecht, Bill Kristol, George Perkovich, Karim Sadjadpour, Sanam Vakil

September 27, 2006

Sign In My Account

@ 2006-2024, Open to Debate Foundation, All rights reserved