The Trump administration has launched an unprecedented assault on Harvard University, freezing more than $2billion in federal research grants, slashing another $450million, threatening $100million in contracts, as well as threatening to revoke its tax-exempt status and its practice of international student enrollment — all aimed at pressuring the university on allegations of campus antisemitism, “anti‑Americanism,” diversity programs, and free-speech issues. Some have praised the administration’s actions, saying what has happened necessitates consequences.Harvard has pushed back with lawsuits, warning that these federal actions could cripple critical scientific research and chill academic freedom.Prominent Harvard figures, former University President Larry Summers and Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz, engage in a nuanced debate and provocative discussion about whether Harvard failed to contain ideological imbalances, antisemitic incidents, and DEI overreach, and what meritocracy means today at Harvard and other elite universities. Experts who have closely followed this issue and a member of The Harvard Crimson, its undergraduate student newspaper, also joined the discussion. As we watch the administration’s next moves, we ask: Did Harvard Have It Coming?
Fracking Debate Discusses Pros and Cons Of Shale Gas Boom
July 5, 2012
Huffington Post Green
A recent debate from Open to Debate formerly known as Intelligence Squared U.S. examined the growing American shale gas boom and brought experts together to discuss the pros and cons of fracking.