Iran's nuclear ambitions and military capabilities are at a critical juncture. U.S. officials warn Iran could produce the necessary quantity of enriched uranium to weapons-grade levels within a few weeks, which it could then use to assemble an operational nuclear weapon. With the Middle East's largest ballistic missile arsenal, Iran poses a significant threat to Israel and parts of Europe. Those who call for the U.S. and its allies to stop Iran argue this is a “now or never” moment to stabilize the region and protect global security. Acting now would send a clear message to Iran’s allies, such as Russia and North Korea, that would otherwise test America’s resolve. Those who argue we can tolerate a nuclear Iran say while it’s not ideal, it is manageable. Instead of military intervention, the focus should be on diplomacy and containment, as Iran’s leadership has shown pragmatism in avoiding direct conflict with the U.S. and its allies in the past.
As tensions rise in the Middle East and a new president is soon to lead the U.S., we debate the question: Can America and Its Allies Tolerate a Nuclear Iran, or Is It Time to Stop Them Now?
For all appearances, China has emerged unscathed from the global economic crisis, in stark contrast to its biggest debtor, America. China’s admirers point to its ability to mobilize state resources, quick decision-making and business-friendly environment as reasons for its economic ascendency. But can its brand of state-directed capitalism overcome rampant corruption and the threat of growing inequality, or will the American model of innovation and free markets prevail?
For all appearances, China has emerged unscathed from the global economic crisis, in stark contrast to its biggest debtor, America. China’s admirers point to its ability to mobilize state resources, quick decision-making and business-friendly environment…